Yokohama Tires: Are They Good? (+16 Brands Compared)
It started as a joint venture with BF Goodrich in 1969 in Japan, expanded to the US, and is an innovator with sustainability at the forefront of its corporate mission.
How good are Yokohama tires, and are they worth buying?
Why Buy Yokohama Tires?
The top features of Yokoyama tires include:
- Affordable pricing with quality features.
- Range of tires to match speed categories.
- Quiet tires with reduced road noise.
- Excellent traction, frequently scoring A or AA on UTQG.
- Durable.
- Fuel efficient.
- Quiet on the highway.
Yokohama tires are popular with customers who value quality, safety, and a competitive price.
Why Are Yokohama Tires So Cheap?
Yokohama has a consistently low starting price of under $100 and produces a better than average performance.
How does Yokohama keep the cost down?
Efficient Processes
Yokohama focuses on keeping a cost-effective supply line with minimal costs to produce a consistent tire to a set specification.
It may seem obvious, but you can create a tire at a budget price when you strip back your processes to refine your cost base.
Collaborative Research
Research costs are expensive, but Yokohama keeps its prices low by collaborating with its supply chain and universities.
Effectively Yokohama’s research budget goes further because it shares the cost of expensive research with other organizations.
Careful Sponsorship
Yokohama is involved with grassroots motorsports in the US.
The arrangements include donating time and tires to the drivers and allowing extensive tire testing under race conditions without the extreme budgets demanded for involvement in more high-profile motorsports.
Making high-quality tires is expensive, but Yokohama is intelligent in leveraging the most additional support to keep it innovative and cost-effective.
Yokohama Warranty
The warranty varies depending on the type of tire.
Most passenger car tires have a limited warranty covering manufacturers’ defects, and most off-road tires have a mileage warranty.
Ideally, you never claim under warranty because your Yokohama tires are fault free and durable.
What Drivers Say About Yokohama Tires
On ConsumerAffairs.com, Yokohama gets mixed reviews, with most 4-5 stars but some dissatisfied customers.
Some of the positive reviews:
Sure-footed in the rain and mid-level for noise – B, Point Roberts, WA.
They have been amazing tires and so good I will be purchasing them again – Fred, Yorba Linda, CA.
A less happy customer:
The tire had a bulge on the sidewall with less than 3,000 miles. Told have to pay under road hazard and then e refunded. Never again – Jerry, South Bend, IN.
Yokohama Tire Recommendations
For typical vehicles, Yokohama recommends:
| Car Type | Examples | Yokohama Recommends |
| A compact Sedan is a typical small family car with a petrol engine of more than 1.2L or a Diesel of 1.5L. | Hyundai Electra; Honda Civic; Audi A3; Toyota Corolla; Mazda 3. | Advan Fleva V701; Advan Sport A/S+; Avid Ascend GT;Avid Ascend LX; Bluearth Winter V906; Tornante; Tornante Allseason; YK740 GTX. |
| Midsize Sedan – a large family car with internal dimensions of 110-119 cuft, including passenger area and trunk. | Chevrolet Malibu; Volkswagen Passat; Subaru Legacy; Nissan Altima; Toyota Camry. | Advan Fleva V701; Advan Sport A/S+; Avid Ascend GT; Avid Ascend LX; Bluearth Winter V906; Tornante; Tornante Allseason; YK740 GTX. |
| Compact SUV or CUV | Honda CRV; Nissan Rogue; Toyota RAV4. | Advan Fleva V701; Advan Sport A/S+; Avid Ascend GT;Avid Ascend LX; Bluearth Winter V906; Tornante; Tornante Allseason; YK740 GTX. |
| A midsize SUV is typically smaller than a full SUV with two or three rows of seats. | Jeep Grand Cherokee; Chevrolet Equinox; Ford Explorer; Toyota Highlander. | Advan Fleva V701; Advan Sport A/S+; Avid Ascend GT; Avid Ascend LX; Bluearth Winter V906; Tornante; Tornante Allseason; YK740 GTX. |
| Full SUV – basic sports utility vehicle with seating for seven passengers. | Jeep Wagoneer; Ford Expedition; Chevrolet Suburban; Toyota Sequoia. | Advan Fleva V701; Advan Sport A/S+; Avid Ascend GT; Avid Ascend LX; Bluearth Winter V906; Tornante; Tornante Allseason; YK740 GTX. |
| Light Trucks – gross vehicle weight of 8,500lbs | Ford F150; Toyota Tundra; Dodge RAM 1500; Nissan Titan. | Geolandar AT G015; Parada Spec-X; Iceguard. |
Yokohama tire specifications:
| Advan Fleva V701 | Bluearth Winter V906 | Avid Ascend GT | Tornante All Season | Parada Spec-X | Geolandar A/T G015 | |
| Driving conditions | Summer tires and not rated for temperatures below 37F | Winter Mud and snow Suitable for Off-road. | All Season | All Seasons | All season performance tire | All season and all terrain |
| Selling points. | Fuel efficiency and a quiet ride. | Angled V-tread disperses water and snow. Even weight distribution. New winter rubber formulation. | Excellent traction. Better braking. Quieter ride. Durable. | Excellent traction. Quiet and comfortable. | Superior handling and wet traction capability for SUVs, pickups, and muscle cars. | Longer tread life Tire changes shape to maintain traction while wearing. |
| Price per tire | Starts under $100 | Starts under $100 | $180 – $250 | $180 – $250 | $180 – $500 | $100 – $250 |
| Rim Sizes | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 19″ | 15″- 20″ | 15″ – 18″ | 18” – 24” | 15″ – 22″ |
| Warranty – treadwear. | Limited warranty. | Limited warranty. | 65,000 miles | 80,000 miles | Limited warranty | 60,000 miles |
| Fuel efficiency (A-E) | C-D | C-D | No EU label | No EU label. Tire formulation reduces rolling resistance. | D | E |
| Wet Grip braking (A-E) | A | B | No EU Label | No EU label | B | C |
| Rolling noise | A-B (quiet) | 70-74 dB | No EU label | No EU Label. Multi-pitch variation to reduce noise. | 74 dB | 71dB |
| Extreme snow. | No | 3PMSF Snowflake rated | No | No | No | 3PMSF Snowflake rated |
| Ice traction. | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Comparison of Yokohama with Other Brands
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 (CUV like Toyota RAV4) and the Geolandar AT G015 (Light truck like Ford F150).
#1 Yokohama vs. Michelin
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Michelin Cross Climate 2 for SUVs: The Michelin tire costs about $70 more, and it has similar performance to the Yokohama.
The Yokoyama has Grade-A wet braking compared with Michelin Grade-B, but the Yokoyama is not suitable for winter weather, whereas the Michelin tire has a 3PMSF rating.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Michelin Cross Climate 2 | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $170 – $350 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 15” – 20” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 60,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | B-C |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | B |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | 69 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | No | 3PMSF rated. |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Michelin Defender LTX for pickups: The Yokohama tire offers a comparable (or better) performance for less money than the Michelin.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Michelin Defender LTX | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $143 – $466 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 50,000 – 70,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | No EU label, but the construction is more fuel-efficient than average. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | No EU label. Reviews indicate excellent wet grip braking. |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | No EU label. Tires have polyurethane foam to reduce noise levels. |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | Not snowflake rated. |
#2 Yokohama vs. Firestone
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Firestone All Season for SUVs: The Firestone costs more yet does not perform as well as the Yokohama.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Firestone All Season | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $160 – $220 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 14” – 20” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 65,000 miles. |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | D |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | B |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | 71 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No. |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Destination LE3 for pickups: At a similar price, the Yokohoma offers better all-season performance with a 3PMSF rating. The Firestone notable advantage is its longer warranty.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Firestone Destination LE3 | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $150 – $250 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 70,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | No EU label. Firestone scores this as the best for fuel efficiency. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | No EU label. Firestone scores this in the best zone. |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | No EU label. Firestone scores this as quiet and smooth. |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | No. |
#3 Yokohama vs. Goodyear
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Goodyear Assurance All Season for SUVs: The Yokohama and Goodyear options are competitive on price and performance, so the latter’s warranty may be more appealing.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Goodyear Assurance All Season | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | Under $100 to $200 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 14” – 20” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 65,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | No EU label, but has a low rolling resistance for good fuel efficiency. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | UTQG rated A. |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | No EU label, but considered relatively quiet. |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No. |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Wrangler TrailRunner AT for pickup trucks: Both can run on snow, but the Yokohama’s lower price makes it a more attractive purchase than the Goodyear equivalent.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Goodyear Wrangler TrailRunner AT | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $170 – $350 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 20” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 60,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | Exempt class; will vary with loading. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | Exempt class. Sawtooth design with sipes to increase traction. |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | Exempt class. Computer-optimized tread pattern reduces noise. |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | 3PMSF winter rating. |
#4 Yokohama vs. Bridgestone
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Bridgestone WeatherPeak for SUVs: The Bridgestone costs approximately $100 more per tire. The performance is the same, but the Bridgestone tire has a 3PMSF rating for winter weather, whereas the Yokohama is a high-performance summer tire.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Bridgestone WeatherPeak | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $160 – $270 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 15″ – 20″ |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 70,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | C |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | A |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | 70 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | No | 3PMSF Snowflake rated for extreme snow. |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Dueler A/T for pickup trucks. You will pay $50 to $100 more for the Bridgestone tire, but it is more fuel efficient than the Yokohama. However, the two tires have comparable performance in other metrics.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Bridgestone Dueler A/T | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $300- $350 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 16″ – 20″ |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 60,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | D |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | C |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | 72-73 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | 3PMSF snowflake rated. |
#5 Yokohama vs. Cooper
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Cooper Endeavor Plus for crossover SUVs: Considering their similar prices, the Yokohama rubber is the safer option than the Cooper equivalent, with its super wet-surface braking and low rolling noise.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Cooper Endeavor Plus | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $100 – $260 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 16” – 22” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 65,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | No EU label |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | No EU label |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | No EU label |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Discoverer AT3f for pickup trucks: The Cooper tire costs more and has a longer warranty, but the Yokohama tire is quieter.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Cooper Discoverer AT3 | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $197 – $400 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 65,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | D |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | C |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | 73-75 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | 3PMSF snowflake rated |
#6 Yokohama vs. Continental
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Continental All Season Contact for SUVs: Similar prices, fuel efficiency, and noise. The Yokoyama (Grade A) tire is better than the Continental (Grade B) tire for wet braking. The Yokohama is unsuitable for extreme weather, but the Continental has a 3PMSF rating.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Continental All Season Contact | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | Starts under $100 to about $200 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 13″ – 20″ |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | No treadwear warranty. |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | B-C |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | B |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | 71-72 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | No | 3PMSF Snowflake rated for extreme snow. |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Viking Contact7 for pickup trucks: Similar costs, but the Yokohama performs marginally better than the Continental equivalent.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Continental Viking Contact 7 | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $110 – $160 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15″ – 22″ |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | Two years from date of purchase – not treadwear. |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | C-D |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | D-E |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | 71-72 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | 3PMSF snowflake rated. |
#7 Yokohama vs. Hankook
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Ventus S1 EVO3 for SUVs: The Hankook costs $50 more but has better fuel efficiency than the Yokohama, while the latter has excellent handling in wet conditions and is relatively quiet.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Hankook Ventus S1 EVO3 | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $150 – $250 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 17” – 22” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 50,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | A |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | B |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | 69-70 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Dynapro AT2 for pickups: The Hankook tire is $50 – $100 more expensive but is more fuel efficient (Grade C vs. Grade E), and the high fuel price may result in cost savings in general running costs.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Hankook Dynapro AT2 | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $250 – $300 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 20” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 60,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | C-D |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | D |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | 73 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | 3PMSF rated. |
#8 Yokohama vs. Pirelli
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Scorpion Verde for SUVs: The prices are similar, but the Yokohama matches or exceeds the Pirelli’s performance. However, the Pirelli tire has run-on-flat technology and contains more sustainable materials.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Pirelli Scorpion Verde | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | Under $100 to $240 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 16” – 22” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | Manufacturer limited warranty. |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | C |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | B |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | 71 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Scorpion ATR for pickup trucks: The Yokohama can cost up to $50 less with comparable performance to the Pirelli tire, which makes it the higher value purchase.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Pirelli Scorpion ATR | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $150 – $250 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 14” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 50,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | D-E |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | C-E |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | 71-74 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | No |
#9 Yokohama vs. Dunlop
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Sport Maxx RT2 for crossover SUVs: There is nothing to choose between them, so shop around for the best price.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2 | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | Under $100 to $300 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 17” – 20” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 24 months or 24,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | B-D |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | A-B |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | Lower than 69 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No. |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Grandtrek AT20 for full-size trucks: The Dunlop tire performs better, but the Yokohama tire is more affordable and suitable for snowy conditions.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Dunlop Grandtrek AT20 | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | Around $170 to $300 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 16″ – 18″ |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 24 months or 24,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | C-D |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | B-D |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | A-B (lower than 69 dB) |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | No |
#10 Yokohama vs. Falken
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Ziex ZE950 for SUVs: The Falken tire costs an average of $50 more per tire than the Yokohama equivalent, yet provides the same performance.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Falken Ziex ZE950 | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $150 – $240 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 15” – 20” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 65,000 to 45,000 miles, depending on the speed rating. |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | No EU label, but other Zeix range tires rate C. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | No EU label, but other Zeix range tires rate A. UTQG rating AA. |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | No EU label, but other Zeix range tires rate 67 dB. |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No. |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the WildPeak A/T for full-size pickup trucks: The Falken may cost slightly more, but it is more fuel efficient and has a longer warranty than the Yokohama equivalent.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Falken WildPeak A/T | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $150 – $240 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 65,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | C-E |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | B-D |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | 71 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | 3PMSF snow rating |
#11 Yokohama vs. Kumho
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Crugen HP71 for crossover SUVs: The Kumho tire is more expensive than the Yokohama, yet provides similar performance.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Kumho Crugen HP71 | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | Starts at $142 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 16” – 22” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 65,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | No details |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | Kumho scores 9/10 wet, 8.5/10 dry. |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | Kumho scores 9.5/10 |
| Suitability for Snow | No | Kumho scores 8/10 |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Road Venture A52 for light-duty full-size trucks: As their performance is similar, opt for the Yokohama over the Kumho equivalent for former’s affordability.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Kumho Road Venture AT52 | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | Starts at $173 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 20” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 50,000 – 55,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | No details |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | Kumho scores 7/10 for wet and dry. |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | Kumho scores 6/10 |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | Kumho scores 8/10. Has 3PMSF rating. |
#12 Yokohama vs. General Tire
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the G-Max AS for crossover SUVs: The G-Max AS is $20-$40 more expensive, but the Yokohama’s better all-around performance is the worthy purchase.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | General Tire G-Max AS | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $116 – $281 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 16” – 22” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 50,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | No EU label. Reviews indicate improvements in fuel efficiency. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | No EU label. Reviews indicate excellent handling in the wet. |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | No EU label. Reviews indicate this it is relatively quiet. |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No. |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Grabber HTS for pickups: The General Tire costs around $50 more per tire, and it has better fuel economy but is not as good in wet conditions compared with the Yokohama tire.
If you need an all-season tire with snow handling capabilities, you are better with Yokohama Geolander AT.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | General Tire Grabber HTS | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $150 – $380 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 16” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 65,000 limited warranty |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | D |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | D |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | 71-72 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | No. |
#13 Yokohama vs. Toyo
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Celius CUV for SUVs: The Yokohama performs better and costs less than the Toyo tire. The Toyo tire offers winter driving as part of its all-season range; the Yokohama is a warm weather tire.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Toyo Celsius CUV | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $140 – $290 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 16” – 22” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 60,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | C-E |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | C |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | 69-72 dB |
| Suitability for Snow | No | 3PMSF |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Open Country AT III for pickup trucks: The Yokohama is more affordable and performs better than its Toyo counterpart.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Toyo Open Country AT III | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $200 – $700 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 65,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | No EU label, but the AT Plus rates D. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | No EU label, but the AT Plus rates D. |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | No EU label, but the AT Plus rates 70-74 dB. |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | 3PMSF snowflake rating |
#14 Yokohama vs. Kelly
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Kelly Edge All Season for crossover SUVs: The budget Kelly tire costs less than the Yokohama tire, but for an extra $20, the Yokohama tire offers above-average performance.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Kelly Edge All Season | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $83 – $116 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 14” – 18” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 55,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | No details |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | UTQG rated A |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | No details |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Kelly Edge HT for pickup trucks: Despite the Kelly Tire range being low-priced budget tires, the Yokohama may be cheaper for some tire sizes. You’d expect the Yokohama tire to perform better, and it has a 3PMSF rating for winter use.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Kelly Edge HT | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | Starts at $207 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 16” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | No treadwear warranty |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | No details |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | UTQG rated A |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | No details |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | No |
#15 Yokohama vs. Nitto
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the NT420V for crossover SUVs: The Nitto tire costs more, but the Yokohama performs better.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Nitto NT420V | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | $150 – $250 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 20” – 24” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | Limited wear out warranty. |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | No EU label. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | No EU label. Tread reduces aquaplaning risks and provides wet-weather traction. |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | No EU label. Variable blocks reduce road noise. |
| Suitability for Snow | No | No |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Terra Grappler G2 for full-size pickups: Both all-terrain tires will get you through snow and over challenging terrains, but the Yokohama’s lower price is the wiser option.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Nitto Terra Grappler G2 | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | $140 – $475 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 17” – 24” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | 65,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | No EU label. |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | No EU label. |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | No EU label. |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | 3PMSF winter rated |
#16 Yokohama vs. Nexen
Comparing the Advan Fleva V701 with the Roadian GTX for SUVs: The Nexen costs about $50 more than the Yokohama for a similar performance level.
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 | Nexen Roadian GTX | |
| Price | Starts under $100 | Starts at $150 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 20” | 17” – 22” |
| Warranty | Limited warranty | 70,000 miles |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | C-D | Nexen rating 9/10 |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | A | UTQG AA (best rating). Nexen rating 8/10 |
| Rolling Noise | A-B (quiet) | Nexen rating 10/10 |
| Suitability for Snow | No | Nexen rating 6/10 |
Comparing the Geolandar AT G015 with the Roadian MTX for pickups: The Nexen tire costs more and performs similarly to the Yokohama tire.
| Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 | Nexen Roadian MTX | |
| Price | $100 – $250 | Starts at $257 |
| Rim Size | 15” – 22” | 15” – 22” |
| Warranty | 60,000 miles | No treadwear warranty |
| Fuel Efficiency (EU grade A-E) | E | Nexen rating 6/10 |
| Wet Grip Braking (EU grade A-E) | C | Nexen rating 8/10 |
| Rolling Noise | 71 dB | Nexen rating 7/10 |
| Suitability for Snow | 3PMSF snowflake rated | No. |
Alternatives to Yokohama Tires
Yokohama tires are competitively priced, so if you need a cheaper tire, you need to consider the budget brands of Kelly and Douglas Tire.
Continental, Dunlop, and Goodyear offer similar prices and performance.
Yokohama offers excellent wet grip braking; you get similar performances from Bridgestone, Dunlop, and Nokian.
Conclusion
Yokohama tires offer surprisingly high performance for an exceptionally low price. You get budget prices for excellent tires.
Yokohama is eighth in the world or tire sales thanks to its performance and investment in sustainable materials like orange oil.
References: